In the rapidly evolving landscape of technology, the destinies of industry giants often unfold in dramatic fashion. Take Nvidia, for instance, which has risen to prominence largely due to its strategic bets on artificial intelligence, standing tall in a sector replete with competition and innovation. In stark contrast, Intel, once a behemoth in the semiconductor industry, is grappling with significant challenges, leading to turmoil and uncertainty within its ranks.

On December 2, the company declared the unexpected retirement of CEO Pat Gelsinger, who had been at the helm for less than four years. His departure, alongside the announcement that he would also step down from the board as of December 1, marks the end of a long and storied career at Intel that spanned over four decades. Gelsinger, at 63 years old, leaves behind a legacy muddied by a series of disappointing performances and strategic missteps that have rattled stakeholders.

The sudden announcement of Gelsinger’s retirement caught many in the market off guard. According to reports from various media outlets, including analytics from within the boardroom, his exit was not entirely voluntary; it stemmed from a growing dissatisfaction among board members regarding his ability to navigate Intel through a period marked by intense competition and declining market share.

Under Gelsinger's leadership, Intel witnessed a remarkable downfall. Not only did the company’s once-dominant market position wane, but investor patience also began to fray as the financial forecasts turned grim. As of recent reports, Intel's stock had plummeted by a staggering 52% over the year, and the company’s market capitalization had dipped below $103.21 billion—less than half of what it was worth in 2021. This was a sharp decline for a company that once prided itself on being at the forefront of semiconductor manufacturing.

Advertisement

The pressing question now is: what lies ahead for Intel in the wake of such an abrupt leadership change?

Shifts in Performance and Leadership: The Downfall of a Tech Titan

Rewind to the year 2020. At that point, Intel was faced with an existential threat, not from an external invasion but from entrenched rivals like AMD and Apple, who were emerging as formidable forces in the semiconductor sphere. They rapidly advanced in both chip design and manufacturing capabilities, leaving Intel scrambling to reclaim its lost glory while tauntingly overshadowed by competitors like TSMC, who were excelling in sophisticated process technologies.

In this fiercely competitive environment, Gelsinger, a veteran with over a decade of service at Intel, re-emerged on the scene. Having started his journey at Intel in 1979, he was once viewed as a potential candidate for the CEO position before leaving the company in 2009 to take on a senior role at EMC. His comeback in February 2021 was met with high expectations from stakeholders who hoped for a “Steve Jobs returns to Apple” kind of turnaround.

The start of Gelsinger’s term was marked by ambitious plans to revitalize Intel, redirecting the company towards becoming a leading chip manufacturer, with aspirations to compete directly with powerhouses Samsung and TSMC. He took charge of rolling out Intel’s IDM 2.0 strategy, a bold initiative aimed at enhancing the company’s foundry capabilities and creating an extensive domestic chip manufacturing network.

This ambitious endeavor would require a staggering investment of over $100 billion, an investment that would ultimately strain Intel’s financial health. Traditionally, Intel had functioned as a designer and producer of chips, rarely stepping into the realm of producing chips for other companies. Under the IDM 2.0 framework, however, the plan was to boost wafer fabrication services for third-party designs, attempting to reclaim its position as a frontrunner in semiconductor manufacturing.

When Gelsinger assumed the CEO role, his vision was clear: Intel aimed to return to its leading position in the industry by 2025, laying out a technological roadmap that included achieving 7nm, 4nm, 3nm, and newer nodes like 20A (equivalent to 2nm) and 18A (equivalent to 1.8nm) within a four-year timeframe.

However, the financial implications of such grand plans became apparent as costs escalated, creating a profound and adverse impact on Intel's free cash flow and increasing the company’s debt load. During the same period, the capital expenditure skyrocketed, with figures ballooning to $18.7 billion in 2021, $24.8 billion in 2022, and $25.8 billion in 2023. But rather than achieving the desired turnaround, the financial reports reflected an alarming trend of declining revenues.

Earnings reports revealed that Intel's income had dipped for two consecutive years leading into 2024, and the company initiated several austerity measures in an attempt to stabilize. Nonetheless, persistent losses marred the memory of once-successful ventures. Intel announced that in the first half of 2024, it incurred a net loss of $1.99 billion.

Gelsinger’s leadership faced increasing scrutiny following a disappointing quarterly report in August 2024, leading to one of the most dramatic drops in stock price over the past fifty years. By the third quarter of 2024, Intel’s revenue plummeted to $13.28 billion, a drop of 6.2% year-on-year, with losses reaching a staggering $16.6 billion—setting a historic precedent for the company.

In a desperate bid to stem losses and regain investor confidence, the company announced plans to trim its workforce by over 15%, amounting to layoffs of at least 16,000 employees, while also suspending dividend payments. However, as the market's doubts grew, these measures seemed insufficient to assuage investor concerns regarding Intel's future.

While Nvidia basked in the limelight of AI and realized a staggering 550% increase in stock price over the last two years, Intel has seemingly been left in the dust, seeing its shares decrease by 54.3% since the beginning of 2024.

The Search for a New Visionary Leader

The abrupt departure of Gelsinger signals a critical juncture for Intel, leading to urgent discussions regarding the future leadership of the company. The board of directors is actively seeking a new chief executive officer, with current interim co-CEOs David Zinsner and Michelle Johnston Holthaus stepping in to steer the company temporarily.

In the board's announcement, independent chair Jeremia noted, "While we have made significant progress in reshaping our manufacturing competitiveness and building world-class foundry capabilities, we acknowledge that much work remains to be done, and we are committed to earning back investor confidence. Our primary mission as a board is to put the product division at the center of everything we do."

Intel's operations consist primarily of three segments: PC chips, data center/server chips, and foundry services. Due to the exorbitant expenditures tied to the foundry segment, which struggle to yield short-term profitability, over half of Intel's profits are still derived from the PC segment.

Once a powerful force in the PC domain, Intel experienced decades of uninterrupted growth, reaching a peak market valuation of over $300 billion in 2000—an accomplishment that positioned the company light-years ahead of competitors during that era. Today, however, Intel's grip on the PC market remains solid, holding an impressive 78% market share in PC chips according to Canalys data from March 2024, while also maintaining a significant presence in the x86 data center chip market with a 75% share as of a November 2024 report from Mercury Research.

Nevertheless, relentless challenges loom in the backdrop. With the PC market steadily saturating and the rise of mobile and other consumer electronics, Intel's previous explosive growth appears to be a relic of the past. Competitors such as AMD are steadily eroding Intel’s market share. As evidenced by Mercury Research's report in the second quarter of 2024, AMD's server CPU market share climbed to 24.1%, marking a 0.5% quarter-on-quarter and a 5.6% year-on-year increase, whereas Intel's market share fell to 75.9%.

Tech companies are often viewed as reflections of their CEOs, and Gelsinger's exit adds intense pressure on whoever steps into the role next. The upcoming CEO will have the vital task of steering the company through turbulent waters and seizing opportunities in a time filled with uncertainties—all while trying to usher Intel back to a respectable standing in the semiconductor industry.